Wednesday, 1 February 2017

HEALTH PROPOSAL





Independent pharmacies are threatened with closures.  

The CPA may support the idea of pharmacies being re- located within care homes where possible, not only for easy access for, and advice to, elderly residents but also for cost-efficiency*.

While out at a Public Meeting re. Phamacies, 11/11/16 it was mentioned that it would be more cost-efficient for pharmacies to be located in care homes*.  At present there are 53 care homes in Sutton.

Sunday, 22 January 2017

GENDER DIVERSITY




A book entitled “ Can I tell you about Gender Diversity” is being introduced into Schools with the support of the Education Authority. The book promotes the teaching of transgender principles to young  children and the removal of signs outside toilets such as BOYS and GIRLS to promote the idea that children can use whichever toilet they want.

I have written both to the Prime Minister about this as follows: 

Dear Mrs May,
I write to you out of concern that the Department of Education is promoting within our schools a book called “Can I tell you about Gender Diversity” by C J Atkinson.
This small, rather non-academic approach to the sex education of our children is disturbing. I am shocked that the Department of Education would support and even recommend this books inclusion in the school curriculum.  The book seeks to sexualise all children at an early age and raises transgender issues in their minds which will, without doubt, cause them confusion.
The removal of the words “Boys” “Girls” outside toilets, that children should not be referred to as a boy or girl and the idea that changes in vocabulary, signage and dress concerning gender should be changed in our schools in the interest of our children is bizarre. The book which argues this is poorly written and evidenced and reads as fantasy or fiction and should not be considered an advisory or academic work.
The sexualisation of children before an appropriate age is a recent phenomenon in our education system and the approach this author takes will not help our children become balanced adults. The books assumptions that its recommendations will help our children is ludicrous and unfounded. The book contains no academic research to support its strange ideas. We must not be taken in by the idea that all children are battling with transgender issues which is the premise of this book.
Parents are responsible to teach their own children about sexual issues and parents are the only ones who really know how and when it is appropriate to do so. We must not allow the Department of Education to remove parental responsibilities and promote the ill-founded ideas within this book.
As you know The Bible makes it very clear that parents should teach their children Godly behaviour and that this will stand them in good stead for the rest of their lives. We are privileged in the UK to    have in you a Prime minister who was raised in a Godly manner enabling you to lead our nation in a similar way. I am therefore hopeful that you will advise the Department of Education to withdraw this book from our schools and stop the teaching of transgender issues to our Children.
Proverbs 22:6 states;  “ Start children off on the way they should go, and even when they are old they will not turn from it” Abraham Lincoln stated when referring to this verse of scripture “There is one way to bring up a child in the way he should go and that is to travel that way yourself”.
We must make to possible for our teachers to mentor our children in the ways that God intended. This will give our children the same opportunity you were given and that is to make up their own minds, at the appropriate age, with the full knowledge of right and wrong.

Thursday, 19 January 2017

ISRAEL THE FORERUNNER?

While at a Father's House conference I joined in with a conversation about the State of Israel in which  an acquaintance related how, when speaking with a group of Orthodox Jews they declared 'We don't do Israel'. 

Apparently they see the true Israel as being one that will fulfil all God's laws prior to the return of the Messiah, Yeshua, and not the current Zionist State.

I suggested that if the current State of Israel is not, as they see it, the true Israel, then perhaps it is the forerunner, as John The Baptist / Baptizer was the forerunner to Our Lord. My acqaintance agreed.

As John the Baptist pointed to Our Lord, then the State of Israel points to a 'true orthodox Israel'.  

As the State of Israel itself:

a) has probably the most moral defence forces in the world (aiming to minimise civilian casualties in the last Gaza conflict);

b) is always ready to give assistance to other nations when disasters happened;

c) treats Palestinians and even Hamas officials' relatives in Israeli hospitals;

d) allows all views to be expressed within its borders.  A nation that has remained undisturbed by the so-called Arab spring taking place over nearly the last five years.

Whatever its detractors say, Israel is at least the forerunner and also the forerunner to Our Lord's return, despite His own rejecting Him (St John, Ch 1).  It is to Israel that He shall return when His feet stand on the Mount of Olives and He ushers in the New Kingdom while pronouncing judgement on those who have come against Israel.  

Israel still has a special  plan  in God's purposes.

(Linked to Christian Peoples Alliance Facebook)

SOMALI PIRACY


Attended a meeting at which it was mentioned that Somalis turn to piracy as 'it provides the jobs'.  Otherwise they would have been fishing in their home waters .. but for multinational companies who allow their vessels to fish off the Somali coast.

The Christian Peoples Alliance believes in the flourishing and dignity of human beings and in addressing issues that lead to impoverishment (inc. human) of other nations.  Multinationals may exercise great power but need to be called to account if working against the common good.

 

Monday, 5 December 2016

www.breakingisraelnews.com/79560/biblical-pillar-cloud-appears-golan-proving-hand-god-protects-israel-isis/?utm_source=Breaking+Israel+News&utm_campaign=2fa7518b99-BIN_morning_12_16&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b6d3627f72-2fa7518b99-86635213&mc_cid=2fa75

Monday, 28 November 2016

RICHMOND BY-ELECTION,1/12/16

Triggered by Zac Goldsmith's resignation over the Government's decision to go ahead with a third runway at Heathrow it would seem our (very-long-term) proposal for a hub airport located within the Thames Estuary are bearing fruit, as: 

'We are the only party supporting the Thames Estuary as the right solution to the Heathrow problem.  

There are a few people on the streets telling us they are going to vote for us. With more support it could grow' (quote).  




There are added benefits to an estuary airport: 

A short-haul seaplane company, similar to Loch Lomond Seaplanes, to fly passengers between London and Osea Island, could be set up in the River Thames Estuary, to ‘ferry’ passengers from the City to an estuary airport, constructively using London’s River (‘Return Of The Seaplane Lets Stylish Flyers Make A Splash’ (Times, March 14th, 2016)) http://www.lochlomondseaplanes.com/skye-seaplanes;

using reclaimed land, possibly new dams could be built within the Thames Estuary, so as to provide hydro-electric power to local communities, a truly ‘green’ alternative to Hickley Point.

                                                                                                                                                                 

At a previous CPA meeting I suggested that more use could be made of Stansted, Gatwick and Luton Airports as an immediate short-term measure.  

A) they have direct rail links to the capital; 
B) doing so would lessen the pressure / calls for a third runway at Heathrow: 

Sir, if .. thirty-two airlines are waiting for slots at Heathrow, that does not prove the case for a runway at Gatwick.  .. (It) would make more sense to make full use of our existing London airports.  Stansted is at present only half-full, Luton only 55% full.  The thirty-two airlines could find slots there tomorrow: they would have to wait at least ten years for a new runway to be built at Gatwick (Brendon Sewill, Chairman, Gatwick Area Conservation Campaign, Times Letters, June 8th, 2016)’. 
 
 
Passenger movements in millions
From the above it can be clearly seen that Gatwick, Luton and Stansted Airports are underused, especially for handling cargo.